09 June 2014

GM Ellesmere Port, UK 50 Years

Canal boats passed through this port many years ago and it now houses the National Waterways Museum with the largest collection of canal boats in the world. I have a connection to the town of Ellesmere Port I won't bore you with here, but it caught my eye when I found out that the GM car plant located there is 50 years old. I wrote about the plant back in 2005, found by clicking here.


The plant is now fifty years old and celebrated as they do with the original Viva model and the current Astra. It was built on a disused WWII airfield to supply other UK factories with subassemblies and engines. However, the Viva HA model started to be made there in 1964. 

By 1975 all Chevettes were manufactured at Ellesmere Port and in 1980 the first Opel badged cars were produced - to go to Germany. In 1981 the Astra model was introduced. In 2005, EP passed the 4,000,000 mark for cars produced.

In recent times GM has been trying to refine its European operations to make them profitable and that meant fewer factories. Ellesmere Port was a possible casualty but it has been given the green light for the 2015 Astra to be made there along with the Gliwice plant in Poland. They will be the only factories making that model.

I have put together a series of lists below, in ten year increments of EP production numbers. Ones that are estimates are rounded. As to why manufacturers do not put this sort of thing out in the public domain I do not know. Anyway, it is very close to exact but has various sources and is not absolute in accuracy. It could depend whether the source included the van variant of the car, or just counted passenger cars.




64-73

74-83

84-93


64 7,776
74 94,618
84 34,403


65 39,312
75 90,191
85 50,592


66 62,848
76 101,000
86 74,082


67 132,240
77 93,237
87 89,539


68 151,612
78 84,041
88 89,425


69 110,882
79 58,765
89 87,266


70 115,561
80 55,002
90 105,024


71 122,958
81 44,204
91 90,233


72 127,201
82 51,379
92 117,511


73 93,417
83 49,250
93 111,047


Av 96381
Av 72169
Av 84912



94-03

04-13





94 102,527
04 125,981





95 108,152
05 189,196




96 112,424
06 143,654





97 102,020
07 115,476





98 98,197
08 102,481





99 154,741
09 76,771





00 154,121
10 102,665





01 132,297
11 137,971





02 48,332
12 90,187





03 30,286
13 73,502





Av 104310
Av 115788














04 June 2014

Italy Top Four Brands : 1980-89

The Lancia Prisma

Sales history of cars can be patchy. It can also vary if different sources are used to put a timeline of sales together. The sales I found changed dramatically form 1989 to 1990, as you will see when that is released in due course. It is put together with due diligence and the highest accuracy possible. Bearing that in mind....

The 1980's in Italy had a more settled feel to it. Renault was second for years, but then replaced by a resurgent Lancia thanks I believe to the Y10 model. Alfa Romeo fell away suffering financial problems and was bought by Fiat in 1986. It was then merged with Lancia.

The percentage of the top four on the extreme right column of the chart below remained relatively steady considering its fall in the previous two decades. The sales figures are in thousands.

Yr 1st Sales % 2nd Sales % 3rd Sales % 4th Sales % %
1980 Fiat 655 43 Ren 160 10 A R 108 7 Citr 80 5 66
1981 Fiat 780 43 Ren 177 10 Lan 114 6 A R 113 6 65
1982 Fiat 751 41 Ren 186 10 Lan 119 6 A R 107 6 63
1983 Fiat 744 47 Ren 162 10 Lan 132 8 A R 104 7 72
1984 Fiat 747 46 Ren 146 9 Lan 141 9 A R 120 7 71
1985 Fiat 747 43 Ren 175 10 Lan 165 9 VW 129 7 70
1986 Fiat 817 45 Lan 175 10 Ren 159 9 VW 129 7 70
1987 Fiat 864 44 Lan 199 10 Ren 157 8 VW 140 7 69
1988 Fiat 956 44 Lan 211 10 Ren 155 7 A R 142 7 67
1989 Fiat 973 41 Lan 234 10 Ren 168 7 VW 154 7 65

The Renault 11

For other years, simply click on the year: 1960-69, 1970-79, 1990-99,
and 2000-2013.

01 June 2014

The Cost Of Motoring Should Be Lower

Nissan Sunderland Juke assembly. Robots help keep costs down. 

When comparing the price of appliances today with twenty years ago, you find they have more features yet are cheaper. The reason is because they are made in larger factories with mechanised production lines or cheap labour. Often one factory makes items for many companies, and a different brand name is stuck on the same product as it moves along the conveyor belt.

Cars today are much more advanced with many more safety features and gizmos. In real terms - compared to earnings - they are cheaper too, but prices stubbornly hold up. This means the outlay for a car is high and depreciation is as well. Then add the costs associated with running the vehicle and personal transport takes a large slice of our income. That is what is holding me back from buying a new car. How can I justify the cost of personal transport? It's too much!

Car makers have failed to take advantage of one key thing to reduce prices, co-operation. There are signs producers are realising that those who share will survive and those that don't won't. Still, it is happening too slowly. The cost added to cars by duplicated costs developing things alone is high and it needs to be reduced.

An example of going it alone was MG Rover. It shared much with Honda and the arrangement was profitable for both. BMW became the majority shareholder and a disgruntled Honda left. BMW needed to find a new partner for MGR but didn't. It tried to run the company without sharing the cost of doing so. It soon became very unprofitable and the butt of jokes from BMW. The joke however was on them, as that poor decision cost BMW a lot of money. They failed to ensure MGR's profitable survival through co-operation with another mass car maker.

It is going to be increasingly difficult for car makers to go it alone. Sharing as much as they can with other car makers will save money, increase profits and lowering the price of cars. It would even better if car makers made cars for each other and with clever body changes made them look quite different. That would really reduce prices (and therefore debt and deprecitation for the buyer) but that seems one step most manufacturers won't take. It would make the cost of motoring much lower.